About Monkey 2 › Forums › General Discussion › Website refresh
This topic contains 46 replies, has 17 voices, and was last updated by
Diffrenzy
1 year, 2 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 18, 2018 at 10:06 am #12921
Hi All
A refresh of http://monkeycoder.co.nz/ is eminent.
This might cause a few glitches and a little downtime, while changing to the new layout.
Best Regards
January 18, 2018 at 10:14 am #12922I’m looking forward to see this!
I have a little suggestion about the doc page. I’m actually using the old theme because the treeview font (left column) is a bit small/blurry on my screen. So a neater/bigger font would be great!
And the doc’s search box is cleared when you type return, and I can’t get used to that. So 1 times on 4 I hit return and have to type my search again. If someone know how to change that it would be great too.January 18, 2018 at 10:45 am #12930January 18, 2018 at 11:29 am #12943Lanched!
Please report any glitches here.
January 18, 2018 at 11:41 am #12946Wow…Love it.
This, is good….
January 18, 2018 at 11:44 am #12949Thanks Amon.
January 18, 2018 at 11:46 am #12953Hi
nice viewI like the new ‘home’ page and the ‘light’ colors of the forum.
Now I will check every single pageedit:
Good thing finding in the ‘file’ section the direct link to Itch.io AND to the PAID modules. Bravo
January 18, 2018 at 11:54 am #12957Modules are owned by the user who first uploaded them, and you must be logged in is the same user to update the module.
It’s only minor. ‘Is’ should be ‘as’.
I’m still doing the rounds to see if anything is glitchy or not looking right.
January 18, 2018 at 12:08 pm #12961Looks like the “New” page has a piece of the “Home” page in the back! (see attached image)
And the “admob” and “inapp purchase” modules are the first thing you see on the “News” page. Don’t know if it’s intentional, it doesn’t feel new to me but hey those modules deserve visibility!
Very nice work. I’m glad to see these changes, it a great fresh wind for mx2!
Attachments:
January 18, 2018 at 12:27 pm #12964Looks like the “New” page has a piece of the “Home” page in the back! (see attached image)
It was an attempt at a nice “featured image” , changed it to a blank white for now.
It’s only minor. ‘Is’ should be ‘as’.
Fixed
And the “admob” and “inapp purchase” modules are the first thing you see on the “News” page. Don’t know if it’s intentional, it doesn’t feel new to me but hey those modules deserve visibility!
Changed dates to ca. original release dates, to make them not first.
Thanks again for scrutiny, kind words and feedback.
[EDIT] : Currently fixing downloads (modules and files)
[EDIT2] : Downloads working again.January 18, 2018 at 1:23 pm #129652018 is real. VERY PROFESSIONAL OMG YAS. Thank you!!!
January 18, 2018 at 2:41 pm #12970This looks good! Are there going to be other themes? just curious.
One thing I noticed: The example on the main page that illustrate how to use operator overloading is wrong.There is an error on the operator and on the string method. it should be like this:
[/crayon]Monkey12345678910111213141516171819202122232425[crayon-5cb9b3afe48b8443950014 inline="true" ]Struct Vec2Field x:Float,y:FloatMethod New( x:float,y:Float )Self.x=xSelf.y=yEndOperator+:Vec2( v:Vec2 )Return New Vec2( x+v.x,y+v.y )EndMethod ToString:String()Return "Vec2("+x+","+y+")"EndEndFunction Main()Local v0:=New Vec2( 10,20 )Local v1:=New Vec2( 30,40 )Print (v0+v1).ToString()EndI just notice that there is still a problem displaying code at the beginning and at the end.
January 18, 2018 at 2:59 pm #12971Thanks!
@jesseThanks for the code correction, I’ll let Mark tackle that.
Will look into crayon issues.
There might be other themes in the future, but it’s not top priority.
January 18, 2018 at 3:51 pm #12972Kinda like it myself, only thing I think I would change so far is the font colour is a little too light on a very light background, possibly make it solid black so its easier to read.
January 18, 2018 at 6:15 pm #12973Yeah, definitely needs contrast (very eye-straining to read!), but good work overall, certainly looks better.
I noticed earlier that the first code example uses lower-case ‘struct’ whereas most keywords are capitalised. The language does allow it, but it looks inconsistent as the first thing people would see.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
