[impixiParticipant]

I just tried building ted2 on my iMac and encountered fibre-related errors too:

Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
“_jump_fcontext”, referenced from:
bbFiber::fiberEntry(transfer_t) in std.a(_1_1_1fiber_2native_2fiber.cpp.o)
bbFiber::resumeFiber(int) in std.a(_1_1_1fiber_2native_2fiber.cpp.o)
bbFiber::suspendCurrentFiber() in std.a(_1_1_1fiber_2native_2fiber.cpp.o)
“_make_fcontext”, referenced from:
bbFiber::createFiber(bbFunction<void ()>) in std.a(_1_1_1fiber_2native_2fiber.cpp.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)

[impixiParticipant]

If you’re making use of inheritance there are issues relating to constructor “chaining” – might be related to your errors?

There’s a forum topic about it:
http://monkey2.monkey-x.com/forums/topic/referencing-new/

You might need to rework your underlying architecture a little bit to make it play nice with MX2…

[impixiParticipant]

Yes, this is fixed in V1.0.0. Thanks.

[impixiParticipant]

What’s your code for creating a new Store instance?

[impixiParticipant]

Congrats on the V1.0.0 milestone!

[impixiParticipant]

Explicit casting in MX2 is different than MX1. This line:

last = T(last._pred)

Should be:

last = Cast<T>(last._pred)

The following should compile without errors (I haven’t checked for any logic errors though):

Monkey

[crayon-5cb9d7cb5ffe3452226113 inline="true" ] #import "<std>" Function Main:Void() local store := New Store<Item>(20) End Class Item Field _pred:Item Field _succ:Item End Class Store<T> Field last:T Field total:Int Method New(count:Int) Fill(count) End Method Method Fill:Void(total:Int) For Local i:Int = 0 Until total Local c:T = New T() c._pred = last last = c Next Self.total = total End Method Count:Int() Return total End Method GetItem:T() If last Local c:T = last last = Cast<T>(last._pred) c._pred = Null total -= 1 Return c Endif Return New T() End Method ReturnItem:Void(obj:T) obj._succ = Null obj._pred = last last = obj total += 1 End End

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58

[crayon-5cb9d7cb5ffe3452226113 inline="true" ] #import "<std>"   Function Main:Void()   local store := New Store<Item>(20) End   Class Item Field _pred:Item Field _succ:Item End   Class Store<T> Field last:T Field total:Int   Method New(count:Int) Fill(count) End Method Method Fill:Void(total:Int) For Local i:Int = 0 Until total Local c:T = New T() c._pred = last last = c Next Self.total = total End Method Count:Int() Return total End Method GetItem:T() If last Local c:T = last last = Cast<T>(last._pred) c._pred = Null total -= 1 Return c Endif Return New T() End Method ReturnItem:Void(obj:T) obj._succ = Null obj._pred = last last = obj total += 1 End End

[/crayon]

[impixiParticipant]

16 canvases should be enough for anyone!

Haha, not if, for performance reasons, you want to pre-generate variably-sized images of blocks of text/labels/buttons/lists/etc.

EDIT: I should clarify, I’m only using 1 canvas at a time, local to a function/ method while rendering to an image.

Actually, I think this is fixed in my version…it works at 10000 anyway.

New stuff coming soon!

Great. Can’t wait to test it out… Might even be time soon for another donation.

[impixiParticipant]

That snippet should print out the numbers 5 to 1.

I’m actually shocked this bug has remained hidden this far into development (or maybe it got introduced recently?). Reverse cycling through a loop is a fundamental programming task – or at least it used to be.

I only found it because I’ve ported some old BlitzMax code that showed bizarre results in MX2 for no obvious reason. Stumped me for *hours*… Kinda relieved the problem isn’t in my code after all.

Edit:
@amon
Where did you have the code? Reverse For loop iteration fails for me in class Methods too.

[impixiParticipant]

 

Here’s a link to Gustafson’s book on the subject:

Not read it yet myself, as I suspect it’s beyond my comprehension level.

Another thing that needs “redoing”, in my opinion, is character set representation, but that’s another topic…

EDIT: I’ve read the first few chapters of that book now and I’m actually finding it easily “digestible” and interesting…

 

[impixiParticipant]

Well, here we go… A test post.

 

EDIT: And a test edit.

 

[Author]

Posts