Amon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 150 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Diddy2 #10367

    Amon
    Participant

    I need diddy2. NOW!

    For MX it was the ultimate framework. I’m yearning for the MX2 version. Gonna see if there are any updates to it as I haven’t checked in a day.

    🙂

    in reply to: Pixel Monkey #9432

    Amon
    Participant

    Pretty cool. 5*

    in reply to: Which NDK version should be used for the Android target? #8861

    Amon
    Participant

    Done and working.

    My mistake was not allowing AndroidStudio to handle it all. i.e installation of NDK and SDK’s for the various flavors of the Android OS.

    Thank you, Mark.

    in reply to: the first thing I plan with mojo3d is #8582

    Amon
    Participant

    An immersive brilliance astonished only by the power of God.

     

     

     

    Or maybe just 3D Pong first so I can refamiliarize myself with 3D.

    in reply to: Welcome to the new monkey2 site! #8564

    Amon
    Participant

    Hey….I’m here too.

    Let’s shake our heads clear and start some fresh monkey coding. I’m ready…

    Oh, for those new to MonKey2 or programming games, it is very important for you to participate in the community. You can do this by allowing any anxiety about; put it this way, fear and anxiety are gone now and you can post without fear of ridicule, any questions you have seeking help for any problem related to games programming with Monkey2.

    We need you too to post if you are having difficulty understanding any particular subject, concept, method, used in programming games with Monkey2. Why? It helps those seasoned programming veterans to become productive and better teachers. It benefits us all, so don’t hesitate to post seeking help. It will always be welcomed.

    Now get monkeying around. It’s absolute fun, and you will love it. 🙂

    Warm Regards,

    Amon

    in reply to: Monkey 2 concerns #8355

    Amon
    Participant

    I know you lot have concerns about MX2 and where it is heading, but instead of being negative and bringing up the same issues again and again (eg The name… give it up, its not changing. The community split… I doubt having spent time setting up this site the Blitz crew and Monkey crew will every get joined), lets just focus on the positive.

    I can’t count the number of times I’ve helped a fellow monkey dev either on the forum or via personal email, this community can be fantastic we just have to spread the word and create kickass products with a great language!

    How do I +1 this post to infinity? Using MX2 code that is….

    🙂

    in reply to: Monkey 2 concerns #8351

    Amon
    Participant

    The Primary issue you have right now is that a) Mark likes the name and b) Mark does not give a toss what we want or think, he’s making this tool because he enjoy’s making it and he feels no pressure to bow down to peer or financial pressure so the chances of him taking any of this on board are slim to none.

     

    I find this particular part of the post completely disgraceful.

    Taiphoz, there are better ways to communicate without having to assault a person’s character in this way.

    in reply to: Struct goofiness #7900

    Amon
    Participant

    I learnt a lot from this thread. Thank you.

    🙂

    in reply to: LoadAnimImage missing? #7212

    Amon
    Participant

    @ethernaut

    That’s what I needed, thank you.

    in reply to: It is called Monkey 2 #5682

    Amon
    Participant

    It’s MX2, or else….

    in reply to: Pyro 2 surprise… #5468

    Amon
    Participant

    Yes, very cool!

    Thank you.

    in reply to: Drop in Activity fragmentation is bad. #2485

    Amon
    Participant

    A person will program in whatever language they use and prefer regardless of what the forum for said language looks like, how many members it has and probably won’t notice all the pink and purple.

    A programmer programs. A programmer with nothing to do likes talking on forums.

    Productivity is the point. If you allow things, like the OP has mentioned, to hinder how much you can accomplish each day productivity wise, then you are thinking incorrectly for what you perceive your purpose to be; a programmer.

    That is why programmers who live in the shadows accomplish wonders while those like the OP hinder themselves with stupid, non-relevant activities, much like starting threads like these.

    Harsh, but true……………..

    in reply to: V009 now up! #937

    Amon
    Participant

    [quote]Don’t know why not Linux.[/quote]

    Is it like an operating system or something?

     

    in reply to: (Bug) For..Step negative values not working. #908

    Amon
    Participant

    Hmm my bad.  It works but the output is not what it should be. I didn’t check that. Apologies.

    After reading both replies I went back and did testing I should have done when first reading the OP.  Again, though it works but the output is all wrong much like therevills has shown.

     

     

     

     

    in reply to: (Bug) For..Step negative values not working. #899

    Amon
    Participant

    Function Main is reserved I think? No?

    Tested this though and it works fine for me but I didn’t have the code within a Function Main().

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 150 total)