MikeHart

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is this how it is surpose to be? #5837

    MikeHart
    Participant

    github… Good joke Mark.

     

    anyway. Wish granted. Bye.

    in reply to: Is this how it is surpose to be? #5818

    MikeHart
    Participant

    @arpie: No. I even updated mx2cc again (almost half the file size then?!?!), updated Ted2Go again, but the same result.

    If the parser reports a missing End, there probably is an End missing somewhere… but not where it thinks it is. Usually much higher up in the code. This is the reason I always use End Class or End Method etc.

    I agree absolutely. But if the tool doesn’t tell me the correct location, it is hard to find. My framework fantomX is huge, so I would search for the needle in the haystack.

    As it seems that Monkey2 basically isn’t in a state (for me) that let me code easily, I decided to take a break from it now. Initially I considered porting fantomX to M2 because some users asked for it. For personal project I have no need for it.

    Plus I have other projects where I can work on in my free time and I don’t want to get to stressed over this.

    I wish you all a great time and fun. May your hopes come true. And thanks for listening.

    Cheers
    Michael

    in reply to: Ted2Go IDE #5799

    MikeHart
    Participant

    My PC has Windows 7 Home, 64 bit, 8 GB ram, Athlon II X2 255, ATI Radeon HD 4200.

    Don’t stress yourself if I am the only one having this problem. Then it might be my system.

    in reply to: Is this how it is surpose to be? #5792

    MikeHart
    Participant

    @jesse: like i wrote. 1.10.01 works fine here too. Just compile problem.

    @arpie: i know. I was just frustrated. I build m2 first with rebuildall. Then build ted2go via calling updateall2go.

    Needing help? Nope. When Monkey complains about a missing end in a method, in the middle of a class, which is there. Guess then there is nothing much you can do. I didn’t touch the method above the one that was reported.

    Again, no help needed. I will work around this eventually or drop the ball regarding m2. I was just frustrated and needed to let it out.

    in reply to: It is called Monkey 2 #5791

    MikeHart
    Participant

    I just read a comment by arpie that Mark called it MX2 in some of his blog posts. I didn’t know that he was also inconsistant in his branding. Guess it is ok then.

    in reply to: About branding #5790

    MikeHart
    Participant

    He did? Ok, this all is so twisted, nothing is consistant. I will rest my case then.

    in reply to: Ted2Go IDE #5780

    MikeHart
    Participant

    Today I decided to get all the newest code from github. Got Monkey2. Build it. Then Ted2Go. Build that too.

    Ted2Go in the bundled distribution of 1.1.01 worded fine performance wise. The latest Ted2Go with the latest Monkey crawls on my computer and lags big time. So big that you can’t use it.

    in reply to: Concurrent list modification error. #5486

    MikeHart
    Participant

    How would someone implement an extention to a container while iterating through the same? Simple .AddLast or .Push/.Add?

    in reply to: Workaround for container restrictions during iteration? #5445

    MikeHart
    Participant

    Kinda, will have to adapt this to add items.

    in reply to: Workaround for container restrictions during iteration? #5443

    MikeHart
    Participant

    I have to add that only in debug mode you get these Concurrent list modification errors. In release mode it works fine.

    in reply to: Fatal mx2cc error, why? #5440

    MikeHart
    Participant

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Fatal mx2cc error, why? #5436

    MikeHart
    Participant

    Here you go. Offending line is #15:

    in reply to: Fatal mx2cc error, why? #5435

    MikeHart
    Participant

    I will see what I can do.

    in reply to: Ted2Go IDE #5425

    MikeHart
    Participant

    Great job. I finally can work in M2 decently. Is Find in Files comming anytime soon?

    in reply to: Fatal mx2cc error, why? #5417

    MikeHart
    Participant

    ok. No problem. I can work around it.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 39 total)